Quadro Plex 2200 D2 vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameBlackcombGT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2011 (14 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960240 ×2
Core clock speed680 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt640 Watt
Texture fill rate32.6451.84 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3232 ×2
TMUs4880 ×2
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 640 Watt

FirePro M8900 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 753.3% lower power consumption.

Plex 2200 D2, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and Quadro Plex 2200 D2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro Plex 2200 D2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2
Quadro Plex 2200 D2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 D2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or Quadro Plex 2200 D2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.