Quadro M520 vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated695
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.15
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameBlackcombGM108
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2011 (14 years ago)11 January 2017 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960384
Core clock speed680 MHz1041 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1019 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate32.6416.66
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.7995 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4816
L1 Cache192 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s40 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

Quadro M520 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and Quadro M520. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
NVIDIA Quadro M520
Quadro M520

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Quadro M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or Quadro M520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.