CMP 90HX vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBlackcombGA102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2011 (14 years ago)28 July 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9606400
Core clock speed680 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate32.64342.0
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS21.89 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs48200
Tensor Coresno data200
Ray Tracing Coresno data50

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB10 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s760.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 28 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 320 Watt

FirePro M8900 has 326.7% lower power consumption.

CMP 90HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and CMP 90HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while CMP 90HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
NVIDIA CMP 90HX
CMP 90HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 48 votes

Rate CMP 90HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or CMP 90HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.