Radeon RX Vega Mobile vs ATI FirePro M7820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameBroadwayVega Mobile
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 May 2010 (16 years ago)7 January 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8001792
Core clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,040 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate28.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.12 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2010 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 90 Watt

ATI M7820 has 80% lower power consumption.

RX Vega Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M7820 and Radeon RX Vega Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M7820 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 50 votes

Rate FirePro M7820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 410 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M7820 or Radeon RX Vega Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.