Radeon R7 350 Fake Card vs FirePro M6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking633not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameEmeraldOpal
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2014 (11 years ago)2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896384
Core clock speed1100 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate61.6025.20
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs5624
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz4.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s36.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.5 (6.0)6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.170

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between FirePro M6100 and Radeon R7 350 Fake Card. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 Fake Card is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6100
FirePro M6100
AMD Radeon R7 350 Fake Card
Radeon R7 350 Fake Card

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 152 votes

Rate FirePro M6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M6100 or Radeon R7 350 Fake Card, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.