Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
ATI Mobility Radeon vs AMD FirePro M6100
Combined performance score
FirePro M6100 outperforms Mobility Radeon by 312% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 568 | 976 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 2.53 | 0.02 |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | Rage 6 (2000−2007) |
GPU code name | Bonaire | M6 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2013 (10 years old) | 1 December 2001 (22 years old) |
Current price | $120 | $202 |
FirePro M6100 has 12550% better value for money than ATI Mobility.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | no data |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 144 MHz |
Number of transistors | 2,080 million | 30 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 0.43 |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on FirePro M6100 and Mobility Radeon compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | AGP 4x |
Width | no data | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 MB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 288 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 2.304 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 7.0 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FirePro M6100 outperforms Mobility Radeon by 312% in our combined benchmark results.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FirePro M6100 outperforms Mobility Radeon by 456% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 52
+333%
| 12−14
−333%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Metro Exodus | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Hitman 3 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 | 0−1 |
This is how FirePro M6100 and ATI Mobility compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- FirePro M6100 is 333% faster than ATI Mobility
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 5.48 | 1.33 |
Recency | 1 October 2013 | 1 December 2001 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
The FirePro M6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon in performance tests.
Be aware that FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation card while Mobility Radeon is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.