Rage 128 PRO Ultra vs FirePro M6000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking613not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.39no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameHeathrowRage 4 PRO
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (11 years ago)1 August 1999 (24 years ago)
Current price$162 $35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed750 MHz130 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Wattno data
Texture fill rate32.000.26
Floating-point performance1,024 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro M6000 and Rage 128 PRO Ultra compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz130 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s1.04 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
StereoOutput3D1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 1 August 1999
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

We couldn't decide between FirePro M6000 and Rage 128 PRO Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation card while Rage 128 PRO Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6000
FirePro M6000
ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra
Rage 128 PRO Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Rage 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.