Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs FirePro M5950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking780not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.84no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameWhistlerTiger Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)2 September 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480768
Core clock speed725 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate17.4052.80
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs2448
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data3.75 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)Ring Bus
Form factorMXM-Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M5950 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M5950 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M5950
FirePro M5950
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 71 votes

Rate FirePro M5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 164 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M5950 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.