GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs FirePro M5950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking795not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.90no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameWhistlerGF104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)11 March 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480336 ×2
Core clock speed725 MHz701 MHz
Number of transistors716 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate17.4039.26 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS0.9415 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs832 ×2
TMUs2456 ×2
L1 Cache48 KB448 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data292 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth57 GB/s115.2 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 11 March 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 160 Watt

FirePro M5950 has 357.1% lower power consumption.

GTX 460 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M5950 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M5950
FirePro M5950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2
GeForce GTX 460 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 71 votes

Rate FirePro M5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M5950 or GeForce GTX 460 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.