V3900 vs M5100

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

FirePro M5100
5.42
+225%

M5100 outperforms V3900 by 225% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking572892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.830.20
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameVenusTurks
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years old)7 February 2012 (12 years old)
Current price$105 $110
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro M5100 has 1315% better value for money than FirePro V3900.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640480
Core clock speed725 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data199 Watt
Texture fill rate31.0015.60
Floating-point performance992.0 gflops624.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on FirePro M5100 and FirePro V3900 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datahalf height / half length
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s28 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI supportno data1
HD сomponent video outputno data1

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M5100 5.42
+225%
FirePro V3900 1.67

M5100 outperforms V3900 by 225% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro M5100 2102
+224%
FirePro V3900 649

M5100 outperforms V3900 by 224% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

FirePro M5100 6311
+352%
FirePro V3900 1395

M5100 outperforms V3900 by 352% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD31
+244%
9−10
−244%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Hitman 3 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

This is how FirePro M5100 and FirePro V3900 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • FirePro M5100 is 244% faster than FirePro V3900

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.42 1.67
Recency 1 October 2013 7 February 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

The FirePro M5100 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M5100 is a mobile workstation card while FirePro V3900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M5100
FirePro M5100
AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 111 votes

Rate AMD FirePro M5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 85 votes

Rate AMD FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.