Riva TNT2 M64 vs FirePro M4170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking845not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameOpalNV5 B6
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 April 2015 (10 years ago)12 October 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed825 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Texture fill rate21.600.25
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs242
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s1.144 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)6.0
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2015 12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

FirePro M4170 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4170 and Riva TNT2 M64. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M4170 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Riva TNT2 M64 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4170
FirePro M4170
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64
Riva TNT2 M64

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate FirePro M4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4170 or Riva TNT2 M64, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.