Tesla X2090 vs FirePro M4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking867not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameMarsGF110
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date16 October 2013 (12 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed670 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors950 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate16.0841.66
Floating-point processing power0.5146 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2464
L1 Cache96 KB1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 October 2013 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

FirePro M4100 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla X2090, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4100 and Tesla X2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M4100 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla X2090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4100
FirePro M4100
NVIDIA Tesla X2090
Tesla X2090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 9 votes

Rate FirePro M4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 14 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4100 or Tesla X2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.