Radeon RX Vega 2 vs FirePro M4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking802not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMarsVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)7 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed670 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate16.08no data
Floating-point processing power0.5146 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed4000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2013 7 January 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

RX Vega 2 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4100 and Radeon RX Vega 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M4100 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 2 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4100
FirePro M4100
AMD Radeon RX Vega 2
Radeon RX Vega 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate FirePro M4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 206 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.