Tesla C1080 vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameSeymourGT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160240
Core clock speed750 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors370 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate6.00048.80
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 188 Watt

FirePro M3900 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 840% lower power consumption.

Tesla C1080, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and Tesla C1080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla C1080 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or Tesla C1080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.