Radeon HD 7970 X2 vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameSeymourNew Zealand
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)31 August 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1602048 ×2
Core clock speed750 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors370 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000118.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS3.789 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs8128 ×2
L1 Cache16 KB512 KB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data292 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno data3x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB3 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s264.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 31 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 500 Watt

FirePro M3900 has 2400% lower power consumption.

HD 7970 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and Radeon HD 7970 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7970 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900
AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
Radeon HD 7970 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or Radeon HD 7970 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.