RTX A3000 Mobile vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.40
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSeymourGA104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1604096
Core clock speed750 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1230 MHz
Number of transistors370 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000157.4
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cache16 KB4 MB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Form factorchip-downno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s264.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 70 Watt

FirePro M3900 has 250% lower power consumption.

RTX A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and RTX A3000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 158 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or RTX A3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.