Quadro T1000 vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.90
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSeymourTU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed750 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors370 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000no data
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 50 Watt

FirePro M3900 has 150% lower power consumption.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and Quadro T1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 558 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or Quadro T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.