ATI Mobility Radeon X700 vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameSeymourM26
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)1 March 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16014
Core clock speed750 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors370 million120 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate6.0002.800
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Form factorchip-downno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 1 March 2005
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm

FirePro M3900 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and Mobility Radeon X700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon X700 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900
ATI Mobility Radeon X700
Mobility Radeon X700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or Mobility Radeon X700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.