Jetson T4000 vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameSeymourGB10
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)27 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601536
Core clock speed750 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors370 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000161.6
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS7.757 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cache16 KB3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data243 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s273.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 27 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 40 Watt

FirePro M3900 has 100% lower power consumption.

Jetson T4000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and Jetson T4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Jetson T4000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson T4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or Jetson T4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.