FirePro W6150M vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameSeymourSaturn
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)12 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160768
Core clock speed750 MHz1075 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors370 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate6.00051.60
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS1.651 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs848
L1 Cache16 KB192 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 12 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

W6150M has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and FirePro W6150M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W6150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or FirePro W6150M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.