UHD Graphics 630 Mobile vs FirePro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1147not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.36no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTurksCoffee Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 July 2012 (13 years ago)3 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480192
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0024.00
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs83
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Form factorchip-downno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 Mobile has an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M2000 and UHD Graphics 630 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 630 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 44 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M2000 or UHD Graphics 630 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.