Radeon HD 8950M vs FirePro M2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1127not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.32no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTurksSaturn
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 July 2012 (13 years ago)14 May 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480768
Core clock speed500 MHz1075 MHz
Number of transistors716 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0051.60
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS1.651 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Form factorchip-downno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 14 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 100 Watt

FirePro M2000 has 203% lower power consumption.

HD 8950M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M2000 and Radeon HD 8950M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8950M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
AMD Radeon HD 8950M
Radeon HD 8950M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M2000 or Radeon HD 8950M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.