GeForce FX 5800 vs FirePro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1137not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.34no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameTurksNV30
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (13 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors716 million125 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate12.003.200
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data213 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 44 Watt

FirePro M2000 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M2000 and GeForce FX 5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5800 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
GeForce FX 5800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 27 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M2000 or GeForce FX 5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.