Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs FirePro D700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking423not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.60no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTahitiRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed850 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate108.858.00
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs3220
TMUs12840
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1370 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2014 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has an age advantage of 8 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1726.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro D700 and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 38 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 264 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D700 or Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.