GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs FirePro D500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking484not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.77no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTahitiGT218
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)13 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153616
Core clock speed725 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate69.604.712
Floating-point processing power2.227 TFLOPS0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs968
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length279 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2014 13 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 50 Watt

FirePro D500 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

9400 GT Rev. 3, on the other hand, has 448% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro D500 and GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 22 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D500 or GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.