Apollo Lake GT1 5 vs FirePro D500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking474not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.74no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameTahitiApollo Lake GT1 5
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536144
Core clock speed725 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Wattno data
Texture fill rate69.60no data
Floating-point processing power2.227 TFLOPSno data
ROPs323
TMUs9618

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1270 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Apollo Lake GT1 5 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro D500 and Apollo Lake GT1 5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation graphics card while Apollo Lake GT1 5 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500
Intel Apollo Lake GT1 5
Apollo Lake GT1 5

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 21 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Apollo Lake GT1 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D500 or Apollo Lake GT1 5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.