Radeon RX 6300 XT vs FirePro A300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTrinity GLNavi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed760 MHzno data
Boost clock speed905 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate21.72160.0
Floating-point processing power0.695 TFLOPS5.12 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

FirePro A300 has 53.8% lower power consumption.

RX 6300 XT, on the other hand, has a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro A300 and Radeon RX 6300 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro A300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6300 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300
AMD Radeon RX 6300 XT
Radeon RX 6300 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 20 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro A300 or Radeon RX 6300 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.