RTX 6000 Ada vs FirePro A300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated14
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTrinity GLAD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38418176
Core clock speed760 MHzno data
Boost clock speed905 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate21.721,423
Floating-point performance0.695 gflops91.06 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data768.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 3 December 2022
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 300 Watt

FirePro A300 has 361.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro A300 and RTX 6000 Ada. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro A300 is a workstation graphics card while RTX 6000 Ada is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
RTX 6000 Ada

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 66 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.