GeForce RTX 5070 vs FirePro A300
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 19 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 22 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 72.92 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.07 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Trinity GL | GB205 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 June 2012 (13 years ago) | 4 March 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $549 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 6144 |
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 2325 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 905 MHz | 2512 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 31,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 21.72 | 482.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.695 TFLOPS | 30.87 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 80 |
| TMUs | 24 | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 245 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 672.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 10.1 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 June 2012 | 4 March 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 250 Watt |
FirePro A300 has 284.6% lower power consumption.
RTX 5070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between FirePro A300 and GeForce RTX 5070. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FirePro A300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
