GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 vs FirePro A300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTrinity GLGA107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)16 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed760 MHz1552 MHz
Boost clock speed905 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate21.72142.2
Floating-point processing power0.695 TFLOPS9.098 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 16 December 2022
Chip lithography 32 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 115 Watt

FirePro A300 has 76.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 8 GB GA107, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro A300 and GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro A300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 326 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro A300 or GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.