Radeon RX 5300M vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated431
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.22
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameCedarNavi 14
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 April 2010 (16 years ago)13 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801408
Core clock speed500 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1445 MHz
Number of transistors292 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000127.2
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS4.069 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs888
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 85 Watt

ATI 2460 Multi-View has 400% lower power consumption.

RX 5300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2460 Multi-View and Radeon RX 5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2460 Multi-View is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5300M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2460 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 98 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2460 Multi-View or Radeon RX 5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.