Radeon HD 7560G IGP vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameCedarDevastator Lite
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80256
Core clock speed500 MHz496 MHz
Boost clock speedno data760 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00012.16
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.3891 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

ATI 2460 Multi-View has 105.9% lower power consumption.

HD 7560G IGP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2460 Multi-View and Radeon HD 7560G IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2460 Multi-View is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7560G IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
FirePro 2460 Multi-View
AMD Radeon HD 7560G IGP
Radeon HD 7560G IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2460 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2460 Multi-View or Radeon HD 7560G IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.