RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.07
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCedarGA107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 April 2010 (16 years ago)16 April 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80768
Core clock speed500 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistors292 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00042.29
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs824
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length170 mm163 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 50 Watt

ATI 2460 Multi-View has 194% lower power consumption.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2460 Multi-View and RTX A400. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2460 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 55 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2460 Multi-View or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.