Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRV620Beema
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2009 (17 years ago)28 January 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40128
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors181 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6002.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x VHDCIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.5 (6.0)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 15 Watt

R2E Mobile Graphics has a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 113% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2450 Multi-View is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2450 Multi-View or Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.