Radeon Instinct MI300X vs FirePro 2450 Multi-View

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)CDNA 3.0
GPU code nameRV620Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2009 (15 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$91 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4019456
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2100 MHz
Number of transistors181 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6002,554
Floating-point performance96 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB192 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s5,171 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x VHDCINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)N/A
Shader Model4.1N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 192 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 750 Watt

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2450 Multi-View is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI300X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
FirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 52 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.