Quadro FX 4400 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRV620NV45
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2009 (16 years ago)28 July 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed400 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors181 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt83 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6004.500
ROPs412
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps525 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s33.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x VHDCI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 83 Watt

ATI 2450 Multi-View has a 136.4% more advanced lithography process, and 159.4% lower power consumption.

FX 4400, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Quadro FX 4400. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
FirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400
Quadro FX 4400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2450 Multi-View or Quadro FX 4400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.