GeForce GT 720 OEM vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV620GK107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2009 (16 years ago)29 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40192
Core clock speed400 MHz993 MHz
Number of transistors181 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60015.89
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3813 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps891 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s28.51 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VHDCI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 50 Watt

ATI 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 has 56.3% lower power consumption.

GT 720 OEM, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 and GeForce GT 720 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 720 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1
FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 OEM
GeForce GT 720 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 or GeForce GT 720 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.