Quadro FX 500 vs FirePro 2270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1359not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.74no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameCedarNV34 A1
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date31 January 2011 (14 years ago)21 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed600 MHz270 MHz
Number of transistors292 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.8001.080
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L1 Cache8 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz240 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s7.68 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2011 21 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

FirePro 2270 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2270 and Quadro FX 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro 2270
FirePro 2270
NVIDIA Quadro FX 500
Quadro FX 500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 10 votes

Rate FirePro 2270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2270 or Quadro FX 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.