UHD Graphics 610 vs FirePro 2270 PCIe x1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated972
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.91
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCedarCoffee Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date31 January 2011 (14 years ago)3 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8096
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors292 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80010.80
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs812
L1 Cache8 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1Ring Bus
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2011 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 610 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 and UHD Graphics 610. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 610 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 707 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 or UHD Graphics 610, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.