Radeon R7 350 Fake Card vs FirePro 2270 1GB Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameCedarOpal
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 January 2011 (14 years ago)2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80384
Core clock speed600 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors292 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8025.20
ROPs48
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz4.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s36.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.012 (11_1)
Shader Model5.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
Vulkan-1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

2270 1GB Edition has 105.9% lower power consumption.

R7 350 Fake Card, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2270 1GB Edition and Radeon R7 350 Fake Card. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2270 1GB Edition is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 Fake Card is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro 2270 1GB Edition
FirePro 2270 1GB Edition
AMD Radeon R7 350 Fake Card
Radeon R7 350 Fake Card

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 319 votes

Rate FirePro 2270 1GB Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2270 1GB Edition or Radeon R7 350 Fake Card, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.