GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps vs ATI FireMV 2260

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV620TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2008 (17 years ago)25 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40896
Core clock speed500 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors181 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00088.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.822 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MBps1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 31 Watt

ATI FireMV 2260 has 106.7% lower power consumption.

MX450 30.5W 10Gbps, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2260 and GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2260 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2260
FireMV 2260
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 36 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireMV 2260 or GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.