Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 vs ATI FireMV 2250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Gen. 3 (2005)
GPU code nameRV516GMA 950
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2007 (18 years ago)1 March 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data250 MHz
Number of transistors105 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MBpsno data
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 7 Watt

ATI FireMV 2250 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, on the other hand, has 357.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2250 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2250 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2250
FireMV 2250
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireMV 2250 or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.