GeForce MX230 vs ATI FireMV 2250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data32.56
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRV516GP108
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2007 (17 years ago)21 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed600 MHz1519 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1582 MHz
Number of transistors105 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40025.31
Floating-point processing powerno data0.81 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 10 Watt

GeForce MX230 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2250 and GeForce MX230. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2250 is a desktop card while GeForce MX230 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2250
FireMV 2250
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GeForce MX230

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1387 votes

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.