FireStream 9370 vs ATI FireMV 2250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.07
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV516Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2007 (19 years ago)23 June 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1600
Core clock speed600 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors105 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40066.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.64 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs480
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x S-Video, 1x DMS-591x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 225 Watt

ATI FireMV 2250 has 603.1% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9370, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2250 and FireStream 9370. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2250 is a desktop graphics card while FireStream 9370 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2250
FireMV 2250
AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireMV 2250 or FireStream 9370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.