FireStream 9170 vs ATI FireMV 2250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated939
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.12
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV516RV670
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2007 (17 years ago)8 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed600 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors105 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt105 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40012.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x S-Video, 1x DMS-592x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 105 Watt

ATI FireMV 2250 has 228.1% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9170, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2250 and FireStream 9170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2250 is a desktop card while FireStream 9170 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2250
FireMV 2250
AMD FireStream 9170
FireStream 9170

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate FireStream 9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.