Radeon Instinct MI300X vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameRV516Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2007 (17 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data19456
Core clock speed600 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2100 MHz
Number of transistors105 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate2.4002,554
Floating-point processing powerno data81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs41216
Tensor Coresno data1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x1PCIe 5.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB192 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s5,171 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)N/A
Shader Model3.0N/A
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 192 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 750 Watt

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 has 2243.8% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300X, on the other hand, has a 76700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI300X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 59 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.