GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2 vs ATI FireMV 2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV370G94B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2006 (19 years ago)21 February 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speed324 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors107 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate1.29620.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.208 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs432
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mm229 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed392 MBps900 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.136 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-592x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

ATI FireMV 2200 has 533.3% lower power consumption.

9600 GT Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2200 and GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2200
FireMV 2200
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 5 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireMV 2200 or GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.