Radeon 660M vs ATI FireMV 2200 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.82
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV280Rembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2006 (20 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed240 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors36 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate0.9645.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs424
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

ATI FireMV 2200 PCI has 167% lower power consumption.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2200 PCI and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2200 PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 493 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireMV 2200 PCI or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.