Quadro T400 Mobile vs ATI FireGL X3-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR420TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date3 August 2004 (21 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed491 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors160 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate5.89279.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs1256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed454 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth29.06 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 18 Watt

T400 Mobile has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 216.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X3-256 and Quadro T400 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL X3-256 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro T400 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL X3-256
FireGL X3-256
NVIDIA Quadro T400 Mobile
Quadro T400 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 11 votes

Rate Quadro T400 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X3-256 or Quadro T400 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.