GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs ATI FireGL X3-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameR420GB205
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2004 (21 years ago)2026
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6400
Core clock speed491 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2512 MHz
Number of transistors160 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate5.892502.4
Floating-point processing powerno data32.15 TFLOPS
ROPs1280
TMUs12200
Tensor Coresno data200
Ray Tracing Coresno data50
L1 Cacheno data6.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount256 MB18 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed454 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth29.06 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 18 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 275 Watt

ATI FireGL X3-256 has 382.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 7100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X3-256 and GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL X3-256 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL X3-256
FireGL X3-256
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 80 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X3-256 or GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.